Here is the latest update, with new designs and concept paintings
Download a Word version of the U-SEA proposal HERE
( The pictures are somehow missing in the Word version and placed at the end in the RTF version. You can use "Save Picture as.." from the browser to save the illustrations and then reconstruct the document by pasting the pictures back in. It is a mystery why this is happening, yet it is the best I can do at the moment - Michael Hyson )
|
PROPOSAL FOR ORGANIZING AN
|
May 31, 2001 OHANA NO KA HALE MAKAKILO MALALO O KE KAI OBJECTIVE This proposal advocates setting up a community-based non-profit corporation, an "Undersea Observatory Society", to work in an advisory and grant fund raising capacity in jointly developing, with private investors and Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc., the U-SEA TM vessel in the 2001-2003 period according to Emerson Burnetts registered designs. The resulting attraction, will, I believe, become a world-renown undersea observatory and center for marine education, family play, lock-in/lock-out diving elevators, and human / wild dolphin communication. U-SEA TM will certainly become a tourism destination in its own right, drawing to O'ahu divers, cruise passengers and travelers fascinated by the chance to overnight in its unique undersea staterooms and "commune with wild dolphins" in an adjacent Wild Dolphin / Human Seawater Interactive Swimming Area. PRIORITY TASKS Integral to this first priority would be applying for major grants that are available for education-focused projects that create significant employment, revenue and recreation for surrounding communities. Creation of a 501(c)(3) organization that counts world-renown marine scientists among its directors is the key to landing the level of grant funding that would make the efforts of an "Undersea Observatory Society" a major factor in the financial viability of this estimated $44 million project. Sharing in the implementation of the Hawaii State Legislature's mandates for the creation of Hawaiian Ocean Awareness Centers, HCR No. 208 (1988) and SCR No. 237 (1990), and specifically their related "submerged underseas observatories" public education component is the mission of this "Undersea Observatory Society". |
|
PROPOSED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I propose setting up a limited partnership to bind the above parties into a for-profit and non-profit consortium to build U-SEA TM: Design & permit arm: Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. + "eco" investors + Hawaii Ocean Center Planning Council, et al + architectural & engineering contractors Construction, audit & publicity arm: Undersea Observatory Society" + contracted Project Coordinator firm + prime contractors (shipbuilding, etc.) |
|
PROPOSED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (cont.) The vessel itself, I propose, should be registered in the name of the patent holder. The patent holder, Emerson Burnett, and the LP should structure their relationship and carry insurance sufficient to shield the vessel complex from potential tort claims. When design and construction of the U-SEA TM vessel complex is completed and it commences operations, investors, in Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. will begin to profit. The Society, will also be entitled to share in net operating profit yet also will have the requirement of disbursing a major part of its share of the profit for educational, humane or scientific purposes. What institutions, in your opinion, should the Society at that time support? Should the Society move to bring the University of Hawaii itself into this consortium, in keeping with incoming UH Pres. Evan Dobelle's advocacy of UH / private business partnerships? Comments:
FUNDING U-SEA TM construction costs have been estimated variously at $37.8 million (1997 by RE 2 Economic Consultants (Jeff Pietsch, et al), and $43.1 million (E. Burnett and M. Johnson, Dec., 1999). Rounding the latter to $44 million, I recommend this proposed Limited Partnership aim at a capitalization formula such as:
A more comprehensive estimate of construction costs, along with an initial reserve for operations, would be generated, of course, in the course of putting together a business plan. We should keep in mind that Title XI Federal Loan proceeds can go all the way up to 87.5% of the vessel's cost, if necessary. For example, if actual costs were to total $60 million, and the above factors of a capitalization formula remain constant, Title XI Loan participation would rise to:
|
|
INTERNAL FUNDING The Society would, of course, also need to generate a certain amount of funding for its own operations. Some of these funding avenues would very likely also become major sources of construction funds. Questions that could be considered at initial organizational meetings include: * Grants: Is there perhaps an existing grant that could encompass the beginning of work on an undersea observatory? How long would a "fast track" application for an initial operating "technology grant" take? Would the Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate take an interest in the undersea observatory? Comments: * Govt. Appropriations: Which State of Hawaii, C & C of Honolulu, O.H.A., or Federal programs could make an appropriation from a current budget? Could a portion of the $10.5 million appropriation approved by the 1986 Legislature be revived for the U-SEA TM project from Hawaii Tourism Authority funds? Comments: * Membership dues: several memberships could be offered, with short-term collections amounting to several thousand dollars. Benefactor, Patron, Contributing and Supporting members could be acknowledged individually.
* Donations: an agreement could be made with the Human / Dolphin Foundation (Makawao, Maui) or a similar non-profit group so that donors could receive a tax deduction for donations sent or phoned in to them specifically for the "Ohana No Na Makakilo Malalo O Ke Kai" (my nomination for an "Undersea Observatory Society" name). Comments:
Funds raised in the first 60
days by a combination of the above strategies could prove
sufficient to hire an acting Executive Director and other
project development workers, lease office space and purchase
hardware to begin planning work in tandem with Sea Habitat
Hawaii Inc. Planning work would, of course, include
gathering information required by the Pacific Business
Center to put together a business plan. |
|
MY ACQUAINTANCE WITH A
GENIUS
Nearly 20 years later I met up with him again in
Honolulu, and this time he eagerly showed me an imaginative
plan for a stationary vessel, U-SEA
TM.
He told me that he's lived in several different coastal
locations on O'ahu over the past eight years, searching for
a marine environment ideal for the U-SEA
TM
vessel. Now residing beachside at Makaha, he reports
swimming with sea turtles and many other species on his
weekly butterfly stroke workouts. His accounts of scary
encounters with Mano out there make me fearful that
someday a shark will have him for lunch, but then again
Mano may be leaving him alone just long enough for
the U-SEA TM
project to reach completion. ![]()
|
|
WHY AN UNDERSEA OBSERVATORY SOCIETY IS NEEDED I feel that a society that we could name, say, "Ohana No Ka Hale Makakilo Malalo O Ke Kai" ("Ohana for Habitat of Observing Eyes Under the Sea") is, in several ways, vital for the uninterrupted progress of the U-SEA TM project:
Each committee would have at least one salaried project development worker, hire consultants and pay stipends as needed, and have its own office or the use of conference rooms. These working committee teams would be called "departments" in a traditionally-structured business. Comments: |
|
WHY AN "UNDERSEA OBSERVATORY SOCIETY' IS NEEDED (cont.)
|
|
WHO FAVORS THE
U-SEA
TM
APPROACH
|
|
WHO FAVORS THE U-SEA TM APPROACH (cont.)
HISTORY OF THE U-SEA TM PROJECT $23.5 MILLION APPROPRIATION PASSED BY HAWAII STATE LEGISLATURE
|
|
HISTORY OF THE U-SEA
TM
PROJECT (cont.) MAUI PHASE Success in obtaining all needed permits and a lease for that Maui site was due, no doubt, to Emerson's considerable skill in dealing with county, State, and Federal permit and planning offices. Much of this admittedly political skill was garnered in his years spent working in Gov. Jack Burns' campaigns and also while serving as U.S. Rep. Patsy Mink's chief of staff in Congress. In the 1970's in San Francisco he proved that getting a lease and permits for his Pier 39 / floating aquarium concept in 18 months was due in large part to location; he and associates of Sea Habitat Corp. leased an office at Pier 5 on San Francisco's waterfront, right next to the Port Commission!
O'AHU PHASE A front-page article in the Feb. 7, 1998 Honolulu Star-Bulletin banner-headlined, "Will O'ahu Undersea Hotel Float?", incorrectly stated that several personalities that had been brought in from California were officers of Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. The Honolulu Star-Bulletin later printed a correction. In Feb., 1999 officers of Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. attended an initial meeting with the principals of the firm that is developing the Ko 'Olina section of leeward O'ahu. The principals, after expressing their fascination with the U-SEA TM concept, agreed to hold further discussions about locating the U-SEA TM pier and vessel at Ko 'Olina. In 1999 - 2001 Emerson Burnett, assisted by various artists and with input from engineers, has been conducting significant re-design work on several aspects of the vessel, the undersea observatory and a shore-side salt-water adventure park / wild dolphin attraction. Various private investors are being approached to enter into a working agreement with Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. to bring in capital sufficient to progress through final design and the obtaining of all permits and leases for a Ko 'Olina U-SEA TM site. |
|
ABOUT THE AUTHOR OF THIS PROPOSAL I,"Marcos" Mark Johnson, originally from Seattle, have resided in Hawaii and Samoa since 1982. As a business consultant I've been assisting Emerson Burnett with aspects of U-SEA's TM business planning since Sept., 1998, bringing some 25 years of accounting and practical business experience to the task. My day job as an educational map designer with "Planet Earth Adventure Maps LLC" is getting busy, though, and at night I turn into a pop singer / songwriter. Setting up a "non-profit that will turn a profit" to work with Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. will therefore allow me to return my focus to my own unique product lines while continuing to offer my consulting services to an "Undersea Observatory Society" Ways & Means Committee.
BY-LAWS I suggest that an "incorporation committee", that includes an attorney, compose a set of by laws, submitting them to an initial meeting of an "Assembly" for adoption. Here's a few idea of my own for such a committee to consider: ASSEMBLY A "democratic-style" development organization, where working committees serve in place of "departments", and an open forum "Assembly" gathers community as well as expert input, will help meet the U-SEA TM project's greatest challenge: that the local community feels that they have been heard, that individual's concerns and suggestions, even positions of outright opposition, have been addressed all throughout the project's development. My suggestions for an "Assembly" format: (1) the Assembly could number up to 80 persons, convening semi-monthly -- one daytime session followed by an evening session two weeks or so later (2) proceedings would be carried by intranet and/or Webcast (using, for example, RealNetworks' RealPresenter Plus 8 -- converts PowerPoint presentations into Webcasts) (3) the Chair of each committee would summarize that committee's recent work and detail committee decisions reached by consensus; other members could present views (4) the Assembly itself would make decisions by consensus. Any member of the Society could offer a modification, ask for clarifications, raise an objection, etc. to committee decisions presented. The Assembly moderator could send the topic raised back to a committee for reconsideration of a decision. If no requests or objections are raised concerning a committee's decision, then the Executive Director should sign the committee's decision / plans, announce such and list approvals on the Society's intranet. (5) the moderator of the Assembly could be the Executive Director, the President, or another qualified person, for a term or else in rotation |
|
BY LAWS (cont.) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT AND BOARD (6) Directors named on the application to become a non-profit organization would constitute an initial Board of Directors. I propose that the Board should eventually include the Chair of each committee. The Board, though, should meet only in the form of the "Assembly", even if that means that the Assembly must convene every week. Ad hoc meetings of Board members, the President, the Executive Director, etc. could be held at any time. Agreements and agendas stemming from these ad hoc meetings should be reported at Assembly sessions. (7) Directors should be compensated with either a stipend or a consulting fee. (8) The President should be nominated by any member and confirmed by the Board for a 5 year term. (I will nominate Emerson Burnett for first President of the Society.) (9) The duties of the President include making sure that details of construction overseen by the Society match details of design overseen by Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc., et al. The President must sign (or else send back - "not approved" ) all agendas, contract proposals, etc. forwarded from the Assembly. (10) The President should be empowered to suspend an Executive Director for cause, requesting within 3 working days a Board decision to reinstate or remove the E.D. The Board and Exec. Dir. together must initiate any other suspensions / removals for cause. (11) A list of candidates for Executive Director should be presented to the Assembly by the personnel committee. The Board of Directors, meeting in the Assembly format, should select the finalist by consensus. The President must sign this selection. The Executive Director's employment contract should be for a 3 year term. The Executive Director must not be an officer, director or more-than-5% shareholder in Sea Habitat Hawaii Inc. (12) The duties of the Executive Director include meeting frequently with the President and all parties to reach working project development and funding strategies. The Executive Director holds organizational authority and works closely with the personnel committee to seek out and hire the best personnel and contractors for the project. The Executive Director must keep up with the work of each Assembly committee. (13) The Executive Director may not suspend the President, but may request that the Board convene to question the President's positions, actions or agreements. (14) The Ways & Means committee is empowered to hire an audit firm to conduct a "perpetual audit" of the Society's books. The contract with the auditor(s) would call for daily monitoring of cash receipts, expenditures, bank balances and other necessary data. |
|
|
|
Or sign on as a co-sponsor of this proposal at: www.interpac.net/~plntpuna
FAX BACK / MAIL-IN PAGE
3 ways to help out now:
Please list your qualifications:_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 3. Refer to us persons / organizations that you believe would be interested:
|